Truth Hertz: Circumcision and Sexual Stimulation (12-15-16)

Charles discusses the detrimental effects of circumcision regarding the sex lives of both men and women.

Leave a Reply

5 Comments on "Truth Hertz: Circumcision and Sexual Stimulation (12-15-16)"

Notify of
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted

I was bullied into having both of my sons circumcised by doctors, nurses and even their father. I instinctively was opposed to it but because I had never researched it had no counter to their arguments. I have always regretted that I wasn’t better prepared to defend my sons.

As far as terminology I think it’s important that we use the term INTACT rather than ‘uncircumcised’ which by its very etymology implies something (circumcision in this case) is ‘missing’ or not proper. The tribe has used language against us even in this case.

Even more than INTACT, I like the word NATURAL to describe the penis with foreskin. A circumcised penis is un-Natural to say the least. Everything about the jew is un-Natural and, hence, everything they do is un-Natural and abnormal.

So sorry your sons were mutilated. What a tragedy. The best thing now is to have your sons restore their foreskin. There really is no reason not to do it. I am in the process of restoration and my only regret is that I didn’t do it years ago.

Charles, you’re the best. Circumcision turns the male victim into a bona fide sexual cripple and drives a permanent wedge between him and all his lovers. Can you even come to terms with how sick you have to be to strap down infant boys and literally torture them for the sake of destroying the most sensual and erogenous tissue on their genitals? Who are these sick fucks and why would any civil society show them any tolerance whatsoever?

Alexander from Flanders

Here in Europe all doctors will tell you that circumcision is bad for you. It is so wierd that the US just went along with this barbaric mutilation. Wake up, people!

Anyhow; great show from Charles.

wpDiscuz