Truth Hertz: John the Baptist & Bible Psychology (1-11-16)

christ-is-baptized

Charles discusses the lotto hysteria, John the Baptist, and then the psychology of the Bible.

Subscribe
Notify of
14 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Stephen
4 years ago

Wtf, I’ve tried with Google Chrome and Dolphin browser and I can’t download these shows, they only stream. No good for me since I’m relying on my phone,streaming would be too much time and battery killer.

Juden Raus
4 years ago

No one who listens to Charles Giuliani with an open mind can ever believe in the silly Bi-bull again. He puts all the Bible dupes to shame.

kyuss4me
4 years ago

A little touch of Graham Bonnet led Rainbow….nice close Charles.

Steve
4 years ago

All Charles is doing is showing that a literal reading of the Bible is nonsense BUT it was never written to be read literally but as myth and symbol and allegory and when seen as such not only does it reveal it’s timeless truths but will wash away all this crap with regards religious conflicts etc overnight. I find it very sad to find throughout the so called truth movement that ‘truthers’ do not research and think that deeply but would rather just accept what someone else tells them and reject something that they themselves have not the faintest clue about because they have this mental block when it comes to religion and the Bible. I can listen to Charles and others and understand the… Read more »

Maxx
4 years ago

John 8:44-48King James Version (KJV) 44 Ye are of your father the DEVIL (that’s Satan), and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a MURDERER from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a LIAR, and the father of it. 45 And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not. 46 Which of you convinceth me of sin? And if I say the truth, why do ye not believe me? 47 He that is of God heareth God’s words: ye therefore hear them not, because ye are not of God. 48 Then answered the Jews, and said unto him,… Read more »

Portugalfree
4 years ago

Please tell us what great metaphoric lessons the bible teach.

4 years ago

@ Maxx Yes, The Jews themselves did not believe Jesus was a Jew, and they would have had all the genealogical records. Jesus was born into the house of david because Joseph his stepfather was of that lineage as shown by the two genealogies in the new testament. But Jesus was not OF the house of david. He was raised in Galilee of the Gentiles (Matthew 4:15). That area was forcibly converted to Judaism about a hundred years earlier. A number of early German theologians concluded that Jesus was actually Aryan (Persian). Ergo: Jesus was not a Jew. I consider John 18:36 to be one of the most important verses in the entire bible. Jesus says: 36 “… If my kingdom were of this world,… Read more »

Steve
4 years ago

The christ-cucks are here again literally quoting the jew-book as if it was written by a god.

“They also believe that 144,000 special Jews will become the new leaders of all mankind, see Revelation 7.4 which says: “I heard the number of the sealed, 144,000, sealed from every tribe of the sons of Israel…” They are always shocked when I point out that only 12,000 are Jews, and the other 132,000 must be Palestinian Christians.”

What does your jew-book say about numerology?

Steve
4 years ago

@Eric

ALL the teaching, sayings, acts, healings etc of the Gospel Jesus are found in the ancient Egytian texts by the Egyptian Christ Horus, every single bit of it, so if it was a spiritual myth centuries and centuries before the Gospel Jesus and was never historically factual, then what makes us think that the Gospel Jesus was history ? The Bible states clearly that a ‘jew’ is one inwardly – this is where a symbolic interpretation is the correct interpretation, there is no confusion in the myth, symbol. Again i recommend the books by Alvin Boyd Kuhn as posted in my comment above.

Maxx
4 years ago

I think Jesus was Thor.

4 years ago

@steve Yaysus Keeeriiist, what rock did you come out from under? I’m not Christian, and I truly despise Cucks. I’m simply pointing out that the New Testament is ferociously anti Jewish. As was Jesus. The New Testament, especially the Gospel of John, is also ferociously anti-Yahweh. Jesus never mentions Jehovah or calls the Jews his people. He says the ‘sons of the kingdom will be cast into the darkness’ referring to kingdom of Judea obviously. He frequently contradicts Jewish religious teaching. The Bible itself is all you need to shoot down both Jews and ‘judaizers’, those who are drawn to Jews. I listen to Giuliani because he regularly brings up Bible specific information that can be used to undermine toxic elements of Christianity. He cites… Read more »

Steve
4 years ago

@Eric

That ‘Steve’ is a different Steve, any way, i’ve given up with these so called ‘truth’ sites – but i will say that anyone that actually did the research will know what the 144 000 means, its the same numerical value as Adm ( the hebrew spelling ), the same numerical value as the dimensions of the ‘Temple’ ( a cubit is 18 inches which = 9 ), the same number as the 153 fish caught, the same number as 666 etc etc – they all reduce to 9, and that symbolises consciousness either higher or lower. What has the fish to do with anything ? Study the mythology and it’ll all make sense. But i doubt anyone here will.

4 years ago

@Steve Numerology is simply the belief that there are natural patterns. Fair enough. But it’s extremely sloppy and has no rigorous thought behind it. For example, you mention the ‘reduce’ operations which manipulate the digits to yield smaller numbers. But there is no proof that the ‘reduce’ operations are actual property of numbers. Most people use ‘reduce’ on base 10 numbers while ignoring that the original numbers were not expressed in base 10. Try reducing 2016, the Roman equivalent MMXVI, and the Babylonian, Mayan, and Chinese versions. You will get different results. How about 666, was that originally expressed as a base 10 number, can it be reduced to 9? It dates to the time of Solomon and may be Babylonian, base 60. 9 is… Read more »

14
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x