[Download]
White Man March!
First Kyle has Laura from BUGS on the show to discuss her involvement with pro-White activities and her ideas for the White Man March. Then Kyle has Tom from National Action to discuss what’s going on with the movement in Britain.
Share this show!
Great job, Laura and Kyle!
Kyle,
Keep the momentum moving forward. Focus that energy in a positive direction. Just the message please.
It’s problem, reaction, THEN solution. Not problem, solution, reaction. Let the audience ask you for the answers. No more force-feeding and hurrying through the motions.
WMM, informing people of the on-going crime of White GENOCIDE. Nothing more, keep it simple folks. “Diversity” is a code word for White GENOICDE. — Ethnic Privilege, the dividend that a person earns by belonging to a nation, a tribe. – Asian Privilege, what Asian people have in Asia. – African Privilege, what African people have in Africa. Why shouldn’t White people have privileges in White countries? — Genocide DOES NOT have to be violent. “Genocide involves the attempt to achieve the disappearance of a group by whatever means. It does not have to be violent, it could be a combination of policies that would lead to a certain group dying out.” – Malcolm Fraser (Prime Minister of Australia 1975-83) — What is a White… Read more »
I saw your interview with Thom Hartmann and I think you did a great job with that snake. You barely missed a beat handling his sucker punches. Well done.
Interesting show, although it was disappointing to hear the two ‘Britons’ essentially dismissing the notion of the Germanic influence on the British Isles. One of the speakers cited Oppenheimer, who has been thoroughly debunked, attempted to negate the idea of a separate English ethnicity, and the most recent DNA evidence actually refutes the speaker’s claims. There as been an ongoing campaign to ‘Celt-ify’ the English, when it actually appears that ‘Germans’ inhabited parts of Britain prior to their use as ‘foederati’ by the Romans and long before the ‘adventus Saxonum’. But please, don’t use Stephen Oppenheimer as proving anything, after all academics have long been in thrall to our enemies. Look at his name for a clue…
“The history of English is conventionally, if perhaps too neatly, divided into three periods usually called Old English (or Anglo-Saxon), Middle English, and Modern English. The earliest period begins with the migration of certain Germanic tribes from the continent to Britain in the fifth century A.D….” “Similarly, because ancient and modern languages like Old Norse and Gothic or Icelandic and Norwegian have points in common with Old English and Old High German or Dutch and English that they do not share with French or Russian, it is clear that there was an earlier unrecorded language that can be called simply Germanic and that must be reconstructed in the same way. Still earlier, Germanic was just a dialect (the ancestors of Greek, Latin, and Sanskrit were… Read more »
The extract [from ‘mandevilles travels’ [period 12-15th century : reminded me of the ‘gibberish spoken by the great stanley unwin [see link] “In þat lond ben trees þat beren wolle, as þogh it were of scheep; whereof men maken clothes, and all þing þat may ben made of wolle. In þat contree ben many ipotaynes, þat dwellen som tyme in the water, and somtyme on the lond: and þei ben half man and half hors, as I haue seyd before; and þei eten men, whan þei may take hem. And þere ben ryueres and watres þat ben fulle byttere, þree sithes more þan is the water of the see. In þat contré ben many griffounes, more plentee þan in ony other contree. Sum men seyn… Read more »
Stanley Unwin, there is a name from the past. Of course, unhelpful in regard to the argument against of in favour of the ongoing attacks on the English ethnicity. ‘British’ is something any flavour of orc can be, provided they clutch the requisite passport in their clammy brown hand.