[Download]
Charles continues his discussion of why he thinks the flat earth is retarded and its connection to the Bible, then gets into some more Hollywood murders, with a major focus on George Reeves.
Share this show!
Charles continues his discussion of why he thinks the flat earth is retarded and its connection to the Bible, then gets into some more Hollywood murders, with a major focus on George Reeves.
Another ignorant blahcast, mixing up globular geocentrism and flat earth.
Nevermind that both globular geocentrism and heliocentrism are equally viable in globalism, hence Einstein’s Special Relativity.
Charles is stuck in some inner debate he has with himself. He doesn’t study or address any of the flat earth arguments at all.
If Yahweh was all-seeing and all-knowing, then how come true information was not included in the bible? Mind control programming is powerful. We should never underestimate the power of the mind, nor how the mind is manipulated by others with nefarious purposes.
Just because you ( and CG ) don’t see it doesn’t mean it isn’t there. And never underestimate the power of the mind to deceive yourself.
“And never underestimate the power of the mind to deceive yourself.” I am curious Steve L, with all the documented evidence that Yahweh was an evil creation of the Hebrews, and the basic scriptures themselves, why do you cling to the old wooden cross? Are you afraid of going to hell, is it a social thing, or have you been in the social programming for most of your life, and can’t bring yourself to admit you were duped? I’m totally curious and mean you no harm. I suspect it is the fear of death, and burning in hell. Because that is what it amounts to for most. What if suddenly you could understand that a god of love does not use threats of everlasting torment… Read more »
You seem to be assuming that i read or understand the Bible from a Christian – Church perspective. Your assumption is wrong. I am not a Christian nor do i believe in the literal interpretation of any Scriptures. So many so called ‘truthers’ seem to think that if they don’t know something or if they can’t see something then no one else can. So many on here follow CG’s view of the Bible and yet have never done their own research on symbolism, mythology of the bible, astrology of the bible, comparative mythology, comparative religion etc. Charles says it’s rubbish so it must be rubbish. In all respect to Charles i wonder how he will cope if he ever SAW that he is wrong again.… Read more »
I can’t believe we are still having this discussion. I thought everyone knew the flat-Earth was a psy-op, just one more distraction put out by the likes of Eric Dubay, a nut if there ever was one, most likely a CIA asset. This is what scares me the most about humanity, how completely gullible and willing to follow any bandwagon if presented with sufficient mumbo-jumbo, and mumbo-jumbo is what the flat-Earthers do best. The true miracle, that humans can get it together long enough to function on any level without destroying each other. Flat Earth defies basic common sense. It’s too bad the Trivium was removed from public educaton, which was based on the “common senses” of grammar-who-what-where-when and then applied to logic, later rhetoric,… Read more »
Watching and hearing those victims in Louisiana put god on a pedestal while they suffer and find dead people and animals from the recent floods, speaks volumes about your discussion about that great god that helps no one. Those in full indoctrination mode are pacified thru their beliefs in the fiction whereas those fully aware of the fiction are the most distressed. The government is causing all of the most bizarre weather events ever in history and yet people are still now believing only god controls the weather. HAARP, EMF waves are the tools our sinister Military is using to cause distress and disasters on this planet.
Flat earth, another manipulation of the masses for political purposes and to cause division. This is a deliberate insertion onto the media scene to distract from the huge political decisions happening in America.
These Flat Earth Zombies are like Fleas needing to be deloused ! It is Ironic that they believe all the other things like advanced technology weapons and then say there are no Satellites etc, and EVERYTHING that NASA has put out are ALL lies at the same time. It defies logic. They have looked so far that they have fallen into the Abyss and cannot understand that the things around us that were invented by us, were hijacked by Plagiarists like Einstein. They’d rather believe Jews invented everything, like they keep telling us, including the Sun itself, while we have done nothing but speculate because we cannot see what is truth and what is not truth, and instead watch youtube videos. Don’t these people know… Read more »
How does Nasa transmit pictures from space in a vacuum? Radiowaves etc need matter to travel in. Maybe you have an answer. Nasa doesn’t answer this question.
GPS is done by trigonometry, using land-based towers, not satellites.
If you’d do some research, you’d know that they admit this in their literature
But we’re the morons believing everything, right.
Feck Off.
Space isn’t the vacuum you imagine it to be. Waves of various kinds travel through Space, including very small particles even remains of certain gases of the atmosphere. It is considered vacuum because no material exists in between real Matter, such as planets and moons.
If it were the kind of vacuum you imagine it to be, light wouldn’t travel through space.
I imagine? Either it’s a vacuum or it’s not.
So, how does Nasa wifi us their amazing space pictures that prove galaxies etc even exist?
And even if there were a few particles, as you said. That’s like going swimming by sprinkling a water bottle over your body.
That is a strawman fallacy you are pushing. Radiowaves which are electromagnetic frequencies that travel through space they also travel through a vacuum. An electromagnetic wave transports its energy through a vacuum at a speed of 3.00 x 108 m/s (a speed value commonly represented by the symbol c). The propagation of an electromagnetic wave through a material medium occurs at a net speed which is less than 3.00 x 108 m/s. The fact radiowaves can be transmitted via satellite should be enough to prove this but as you probably don’t believe they exist. I could point out that NASA have recordings of radiowaves of planets but as you probably think that everything they put out is a lie and faked you won’t believe that.… Read more »
Oh, I’ve seen satallites. Nasa offers pictures of satellites in front of planets, taking by accompanying photgraph-satellites, I suppose.
What’s out there (stars) might as well be sonar luminescent. Who knows?
Radiowaves traveling millions and billions of miles without interference, while space is supposed to be flooded by radition, solar winds etc?
Let’s see a Nasa out of space telescope picture, where they zoom from start to finish and don’t do “composites” or any other tricks (CGI).
Can we have a 24/7 satellite shot of the earth rotating where the clouds actually move in the same formation that we can observe from earth?
You are making strawman fallacies again with the comment ‘Radiowaves traveling millions and billions of miles without interference, while space is supposed to be flooded by radition, solar winds etc’ There is interference – ‘NASA will temporarily limit scientific observations by its Mars rovers and orbiters beginning Thursday as the Red Planet passes behind the sun as seen from Earth. The sun will appear between Earth and Mars throughout the month of April in a setup known as a Mars solar conjunction, which can interfere with communications between the two planets. Specifically, during these solar conjunctions, solar flares and charged particles being emitted from the sun can disrupt radio communications, and thus could interfere with the stream of data being sent back and forth to… Read more »
How does explosion based propulsion work in a vacuum? There is no thrust. It’s like walking off-ground.
Do you believe the moon landing was real and they took a picture from the moon of the ball earth, which they now say is pear-shaped, due to the fact that there is indeed more land south of the equator?
Even if we assume space is real and planets are what they say they are, geocentricity and heliocentricy are both equally functional models, due to special relativity (if you ignore the Aether, that is).
Charles goes mainly against Geocentricity but that’s a fallacy already.
There is thrust. Rockets get thrust by pushing against the rocket on one side and pushing against nothing on the other side of an explosion. Rockets don’t get thrust by pushing against the air.
Airplanes and helicopters cant operate at high altitudes due to low atmosheric density. How can explosion based propulsion work without any atmosphere?
That’s like sailing a ship without having it in water. Or a car without a road.
Like I already told you. You do not need an atmosphere for a rocket to work. You clearly do not understand what you are talking about. You do not understand basic science and especially rocket science. I suggest you go do some research study and stop typing comments about shit you know nothing about.
Space travel by rockets is impossible due to the fact that jet propulsion needs sufficient atmosphere. Flying in near vacuum conditions is not possible as a rocket will spin wildly due to not having sufficient atmosphere to stabilize any motion. So what we see as rockets approach thinner and thinner atmosphere they simply begin to turn and fall down. Here is some real ‘rocket science’ for you. There is something known as “Free Expansion” or the “Joule-Thomson” effect, named after James Prescott Joule and J.J. Thompson two of the founders of the field of Physical Chemistry. Free Expansion states that when a pressurized gas is exposed to a vacuum, the gas expands into the vacuum without any work being done. The gas is not “pulled”… Read more »
Completely false presumptions again creating a strawman fallacy based off your lack of understanding how space rocketry works. The fuel and oxygen inside the rocket is not exposed in a vacuum so applying free expansion to this scenario is a major flaw which discredits everything stated. Again you do not understand rocketry and repeating absolute bullshit from one of your flat earth false messiahs.
Explain how jet propulsion works in ‘outer space’ without the jettison exhaust rocket fuel gas mixture coming into contact with the vacuum of space? Others can judge who has offered more understanding into rocketry science in this debate with you.
It is ludicrous to speak of solar powered rocket propulsion and fancy ‘electric propulsion’ without explaining how all this works. Sounds more like jewish gobbledygook lies to me.
NASA used stolen advanced German Third Reich rocket technology and then proceeded to fabricate a thoroughly fake corrupt space program black-hole thieving of American taxpayer dollars. The glorious Third Reich never made the claim of space travel with their technology, the jewish-run NASA did. You are too much of a shill for NASA. Very jewish.
I wish you put as much effort into critically analysing the FE bullshit. NASA hasn’t stolen anyone’s money. The government steal the money from the people. The government gives NASA a spending budget most likely it’s just added to the huge government spending deficit. You still do not believe that NASA do anything so why would you believe anything I say in relation to NASA. So do not ask or refer to me as Jewish. Especially when you provide nothing to prove NASA being Jewish. Pretty much every technology that you attack and claim doesn’t work was invented by Whites so you are just attacking our own advancements with retarded arguments. Very Jewish. Infact FE is Jewish. The great Jew book promotes it as CG… Read more »
Oh, it is your contention that the jew world order is a figment of our imagination? Jews don’t run America too, huh? That jew book contains a few stolen ideas from past Aryan civilizations. Truthful research would unambiguously show the Earth is flat and stationary but you are stuck in your Ball Earth BELIEF. Look at NASA own photo-shopped images of Earth and locate those thousands of ‘orbiting satellites’. They are nowhere to be seen. Most shots don’t even show stars! Your examples reek of unproven assumptions all over. Case in point, ‘molten core’ has never been factually proven to exist. Lava can flow on Earth but it is a leap to conclude ‘molten core’. You won’t acknowledge this, would you? It is this kind… Read more »
Truly delusional or persistant trolling. I have no belief in a globe earth it’s a scientific fact. Your inability to differentiate is disturbing. Your complete failure to address all the problems with FE I present and failure to present a workable model including all of these observations proves that your can not prove the Earth is flat. Until you do so anything else is irrevelant especially anything about NASA. Turning a blind eye to the science and attacking science at all cost without using or demonstrating any scientific method to cling to the delusional belief of a flat earth is insane. Also it isn’t a leap to assume the earth has a molten core because all observations prove the Earth is a globe and molten… Read more »
It is a ridiculous claim that rockets travel via ‘explosions’. When you watch their initial blasting off, that is jet propulsion that moves them. There cannot be movement, if ‘pushing against nothing’ occurs. That is voodoo science. By some magic the rocket propulsion mechanism suddenly changes mode somewhere up there? Might as well believe in StarTrek fantasy.
Notice that all rocket launches will go horizontal and vanish somewhere over the oceans. Why this instead of going straight up? Where is the rocket fuel supply enough for all this ‘millions of miles space travel’?
Why believe in (((NASAssholes)))?. They lie and trick about everything in typical jewish fashion and swindle Americans in the billions every year. Why don’t they call their JPL facility, Jet Explosion Laboratory?
You don’t understand how rockets work so it’s ‘voodoo’ lol. The term explosion was used because Letz used it. Explosions actually damage engines. To be accurate the fuel/oxygen mixture burns in a controlled manner. Also NASA didn’t invent rockets so for them to be lying about rocket science makes no sense. Also they didn’t come up with the laws that explains which they would work either. Infact it’s more likely they use the rockets as cover for more advanced black project technology. As far as the rocket fuel supply goes. They use the rocket for the first part but use other systems with probes and rovers. One comet probe recently died on a because it was solar powered. The russians use electric propulsion for their… Read more »
Simple explanation for Rockets:
Gas pressure due to heat ignition acts on the Bell-Housing and exerts force due to rapid expansion. The force forward is relative to the gas pressure while within the Bell Housing and not the outside conditions so much and there is a reason why a Bell Shape was chosen !. This is the same principle of operation that occurs in our Atmosphere regardless.
Flat Earth numbsculls will insist that in order for a Rocket Launch to result, it needs a Platform to act on, never-the-less, it leaves the Platform and continues skyward WITHOUT IT ! 😀
That explanation is very typical jewish scientific nonsense like the non-detectable, non-proven ‘gravity’. The analogy is you can kick within the rocket as hard as you want to make it move but as long as you don’t have reaction force contact with outside the rocket, it is a dead duck rocket going nowhere.
Light doesn’t “travel” per’ se’, it “propagates” in the pre-existing medium in a wave-length shifted format which is why Space appears to be black to us. hence you cannot observe light actually travelling from (for example) a 90 deg’ standpoint. Re: Atmosphere and Space, why the Atmosphere doesn’t get sucked out into Space: 1\ Atmospheric Pressure Decreases with Altitude, meaning that the Atmospheric Molecules are further apart the higher you go but are more concentrated nearer the surface of the Earth pertains to “Aggregation”. (this is a measured and established fact). 2\ Electrostatic Potential Increases with Altitude while the temperature decreases. (space is extremely cold and elements that make it what it is are highly condensed/ condensed Energy). It is well known also that humans… Read more »
Our Nasa boys contradict themselves though. One astronaut says stars are visible in space. Another one says they aren’t.
It’s whatever fits at the moment. Very Jewish.
Radio-waves don’t use matter to travel but electromagnetic fields.
If there were such a thing as ‘outer-space’ which is imagined to be near vacuum as we are asked to believe, why is it that all the air in the Earth’s atmosphere does not get sucked out there? Please, don’t give the mindless reply, ‘Gravity’, because gravity is a pseudo-science magic invention to explain every damn impossible occurrence of nature. I shall give you an example here. You see the Sun, Moon and stars move above you everyday and you twist this perception of reality and say, “Oh, it is these objects that are stationary but I am moving on a rotating globe Earth”. Do you realize how fantastic is this claim? It is akin to you being in a moving vehicle and telling yourself… Read more »
Here is a splendid concise and very well reasoned out interview Q&A that Charles and all other globeheads should read to start detox their ‘Ball Earth’ fucked brains. Compare this intelligent response to CG’s meaningless ramblings to discredit Flat Earth truth. If you are honest and can handle the TRUTH, the ball game is over.
http://www.atlanteanconspiracy.com/2016/08/is-earth-actually-flat.html
I bet there are a number of JWO agents here trying to sabotage the Flat Earth truth on Renegade. There comes a point when refusal to see the facts so clearly presented is very indicative of something else much more nefarious than mere ignorance.
Haha. The Spanish newspaper that interviewed him left out “Jews”.
It should be easy to discern. I should need no telescope. No youtube. Are we moving? Is not the surface of water always flat? I’m not convinced by your arguments, Charles, as fun as they are to listen to.
I’ll concentrate on Jupiter’s eye. You keep an eye out for that curve.
This deception is massive. Contained within are ancillary deceptions you detail wonderfully in past shows.
The true nature of Nature is not what we’ve been led to believe.